Alameda City-Oakland-Piedmont

City boards & commissions

Stay informed and engaged by viewing the latest agendas for upcoming meetings and learning more about how you can participate.

Click here

Community Classifieds

Explore our Classifieds section to buy, sell, or discover local listings – your community marketplace starts here!

Click here

Oakland City Head Start Advisory Board December 19, 2024

Tom Wong December 19, 2024 0

Transcript Hi. I’ve never Thank you. Thank you. Thanks a lot. You can. It’s it’s good. It’s good. Thank you. Yeah. Please. Good afternoon. Good afternoon, everyone. Welcome to the City of Oakland Head Start Advisory Board meeting. We’re gonna go ahead and get started. The meeting is being, called to order on December 19, 2024 at 3:40, PM. Can you hear me? Can you hear me now? Really? I’ll just speak loud. Kate Chopp will fix it. So what we’d like to ask is if, our translation support, International Connect I’m sorry, International Contact could, present the international contact, instructions for interpretation, with miss Lucia. Yes. Of course. Yes. Hello, everyone. This is Luciana from International Contact, your language host for today. We have Spanish and Cantonese interpreters for this meeting and interpretation channels have been created. 1 moment while we 1 moment while we provide instructions. So, Vanessa, can you go ahead? Yes. Okay. Now, Olive, can you provide instructions? Cantonese. Cantonese. Thank you. Alright. Alright. Now for English virtual participants, please go to the English channel. Go to the world icon in the lower part of your screen and select English or e n. If you are using a smartphone, click on the 3 dots and select English. This is very important if you want to hear the interpreted comments into English in the latter part of the meeting. Reminder for English speakers is to, please, speak slowly so interpreters can keep up with you. So please keep that in mind. Now, interpreters will be asked to come to the microphone to provide instructions there as well and after instructions are finished, we, the multilingual instructions will be concluded. So now Vanessa, Olive, please, go to the mic. Rita Ma from Zoom? Or do you want me to go up to the mic? Everyone can hear me. To the mic? E either either either place is fine, Vanessa. Okay. Okay. Thanks. So do you want me to repeat everything? Yes, please. Okay. Thank you. Olive, please. Thank you. Alright. So this concludes the multilingual instructions. Thank you. Thank you, international contact team. So I want to, at this moment, let the, members know that there will be 3 different opportunities to speak, in the meeting. 1 will be a call for public comment. You’ll have 1 minute to ask a question or make a comment. The next will be during the meeting, where discussion might occur, comments can be made, questions asked before an agenda item is voted on. And then at the end of the meeting at, open forum, members of the public or members here in the room, can make, you know, make a statement or ask a question that is not on the agenda. Each opportunity will be about 1 minute. So at this moment, I’d like to call roll. Chair Molly Tafoya. Thank you. Chair vice chair Lisonbee Bondi. Excused. Member doctor Jave Ross. Here. Thank you. Member Kevin Bridal? Present. Thank you. And member doctor Mari Tomarath? Present. Thank you. Member doctor j j Watkins? Excused. Member me Christina Michaud? Here. Thank you. Member Julia Forte Bridal is So we do have quorum. Thank you. At this time, I’d like to ask, chair Tafoya if you have any announcements you’d like to make. Nope. Okay. Thank you. Then we can proceed with the business of the day. We do have call for public comment. Wanna make sure we do that. Are there any interest in making comments or asking questions here in the room? I see no hands raised, on on Zoom. So at this moment, no public comment. Great. Thank you. Thanks to everybody for joining. We have Quorum, and it’s almost a holiday bridal. Home stretch. So thank you for being here. First up for agenda items, review and approval of today’s agenda. Are there any additions or edits to this agenda? I do believe that there is an edit under the financial report, for the financial 23 sorry. The final 2324 reconciled report for children’s initiative. Is that something that we wanted to, present in January? Okay. So that was the only, staff request. Great. I move to approve the revised, December 19th board meeting agenda. Can I get a second? Kevin, do I have a second? All those in favor, please say aye. Yes. Aye. Aye. Aye. Approved. Great. Review and approval of the board meeting minutes from November 21st. Just a reminder, you did not have to be in attendance to review and approve. So we have quorum to approve those. Are there any edits or comments on last month’s board meeting? Just that you were missed. I’m sorry. That’s all. Sick kiddo. It happens, as you know. Well, then I will not move. Don’t let somebody else move to approve the board meeting minutes. I move to approve the November board meeting minutes. Christina. I second the approval of the November 21st minutes. All those in favor, say aye. Yes....

Oakland City Discipline Matrix Ad Hoc Committee (12/18/2024)

Tom Wong December 18, 2024 0

Transcript We’re now live. Thank you for joining us today for our discipline matrix ad hoc committee meeting. The time is 6:0:2. We have our chair, Ricardo Garcia Costa, who is in transit. We have our captain Bridal Hubbard, and we have deacon Reginald Lyles. Let me see if there’s anyone else in the audience that we should acknowledge. We have 1 participant from our from the public, miss Bridal. Welcome. And, we’re going to get started. I’m gonna turn it over to captain Hubbard. Alright. Thank you. Hello, everyone. I we’re gonna start with, like, we left off last week talking about custody of prisoners, and I’m sure that will take up most of our time this evening. But I do wanna go back to 38470. If you can see my screen here, subversive organizations. I made some changes to it. I’ll read it again. No member employee shall knowingly join, affiliate with, or support any organization, group, or gang involved in illegal activities, or designated as subversive by a competent authority within the Oakland Police Department, including the chief of police, CPRA, or an authorized designee. Such groups include, but are not limited to, organizations that seek to undermine, disrupt, or overthrow any form of lawful authority, whether that authority be vested in federal, state, or municipal government, city councils, or or other recognized lows local governing bodies or laws and regulations legitimately established under the jurisdictions of California, the United States, or other lawfully constituted entities. Additionally, any organization engaging in illegal acts against public order and safety may be considered subversive. The designation of a subversive organization will be based on a preponderance of evidence demonstrating that the organization actively participates in activities intended to undermine, disrupt, or overthrow such lawful authority or commit illegal acts against the public welfare, Membership or affiliation for any purpose related to advancing lawful objectives is strictly prohibited, except when such involvement is essential for official duties supported by a lawful investigative purpose and authorized in writing by the chief of police or a designated official. A long 1 there. The main change here is right in the middle. It was requested last week that we expand on what lawful authority is. That 1 is subversive against and included federal, state, municipal, city, local laws, California, United States, etcetera. And, as I stated last week, California Post, you’ll see it here on the side. They have government codes that govern them. It doesn’t explicitly address affiliations with subversive organizations. But it does talk about being in good moral standing. So 1, assumably, would not be hired if they’re part of a subversive organization because that would not be considered in good standing. Questions on that section? Excellent. I I definitely appreciate the the hack at this. This is pretty, pretty layered. The 1 thing that’s kinda standing up to me is the area in the first paragraph at the end, the bolded area where it says designated as the the mercifully competent authority within the Oakland Police Department. Can we also the way it’s written right there, I have no problem with that. But in terms of law enforcement, can we also expand it to, like, any other kind of, like, law enforcement, you know, folks that are not whether it be, like, an FBI or federal agent. I mean, there might be, like, a submersive gang that’s in a database with the FBI that’s been located, but maybe OPD doesn’t have it on their radar yet or something. You know? Sure. Yeah. I mean, that that would be the only thing I would add on that, but that I like that. That that looks pretty good. But that probably won’t be my final I’ll write that better, other law enforcement IDs to include, maybe. Okay? Like, you know, DOJ, all that type of stuff, Ryan. Yeah. Okay. Alright. Well, if if an organization decided to to, to have a march and demonstrate against, let’s say, the Oakland Police Department for what they thought was some unfair practice or some decision made by some court or whatever, and they marched in the streets. Let’s say, like, it was the NAACP. That would be a legal act marching in the street. Could they be considered subversive? What is what are what is their I think if if it’s not illegal against public order or safety, I would say no. Well, you know, every demonstration that happened in the past was an illegal act. Every 1 of them. Either they had them trespassing, or, they were didn’t have a permit to march in the street or not. So what they were doing was illegal. There’s no question about that. And, so, you know, I you know, some of us may be so young that we don’t remember those days that we think we take for granted that, someone or a group exercising their, free speech and demonstrate it, I just don’t want them to be considered as being subversive. See, I thought the Suburbs Act was not against overthrow of lawful authorities. I thought being subversive was was overthrowing governments in cities, municipalities. You know, you know, I think you ought to have a right to be able to demonstrate against the police. If the police have done anything, as long as it’s peaceful, and you ought to be able to come out in the street and protest, for whatever reason you wanna protest. But if you’re out protesting, then you then now we say, hey. You’re a subversive organization. I thought subversive means overthrowing a government. And it seems like it’s blended here in my reading of it is, you know, just, being disruptive against the lawful authority. Well, as a police officer, I’m a lawful authority, And and people have a right to demonstrate against, the the police. Or maybe you think they don’t. So it appears that we’re hung up on seek to undermine or disrupt, if it just says overthrow. Is that Yeah. I don’t I don’t see I don’t I I think you ought to be able to disrupt. I think that’s free speech. I think that’s first amendment stuff. And, but I’m not trying to overthrow the government. I just think that the the police are acting in a way that I wish they did not act. But I don’t wanna destroy the government. I’m not subversive. I’m I’m a citizen exercising my first amendment rights. I don’t think there’s a disagreement on the citizen side. I think this speaks to membership like the officers. So do we want officers doing that? And if I’m if I’m hearing correctly, I’m a say okay. Go ahead. Go ahead. Okay. No. No. No. You go ahead. Go ahead. Go ahead. Okay. I yeah. Gotcha. An officer, an Oakland police officer, right, who’s off duty and demonstrated against a agency in Modesto that did something that was untoward. Can can we now say that this officer’s, is subversive? I don’t think he is. And I think he has a right to demonstrate if if he’s protest protesting against, you know, against, you know, spilling of oil in the bay or, environmental issues or fresh air, are you saying that if an officer does any of those things, they’re subversive? I don’t think they’re subversive. They I think they’re demonstrating, and I think they have a right to do that under the first amendment. And, so I think disrupting is, is a little too goes a little too far. Yeah. So as long oh, I’m sorry. Go ahead. That’s my I’m I’m I’m done. Okay. Yeah. Yeah. And then and along those same lines, I also agree with you. Like, where does like, a slippery slope. Like, where do we draw the line, or where do you go from, like, exercising free speech or the right to gather legally, right, to now you’re becoming submersive. Now you’re disrupting public order. Right? I mean, what if you had a peaceful protest and now folks end up breaking property and disrupting the bridge and shutting down the street? Now they’re doing illegal activity. Could that be interpreted as now you’re being submersive to, like, government order and law? Right? I don’t think you’d be I I think it’s wrong I think you’re right. To deem a police officer off duty exercising his first amendment rights. And and and for that person to be deemed subversive. I thought this this subversive would be being part of a group, you know, criminal enterprise, you know, some some gang that is making, you know, illegal activity or some group that wants to overthrow the government Yeah. Or overthrow law enforcement. I have a problem with that. Yeah. Like January 6th. Like January 6th. Thank you very much. That At what point at what point, captain Hubbard, just kind of on a side note, just I’m trying to just process stuff. If if a cop is just out exercising their free speech, you know, the example Dekelau said, like, let’s say, like, an oil spill in the bay and there’s, like, a group that’s protesting a oil company or, you know, has nothing to do with, like, law enforcement issues or anything like that. Right? And they’re out there exercising their speech. And then at some point, let’s say and and, again, I’m not saying I’m not suggesting that this is subversive, but just on a side note, in terms of just, like, illegal behavior, like, let’s say a group starts splintering off, breaking property, disrupting traffic, doing things that are basically, could be classified as, you know, you get cited for or arrested for. Right? At what point, not suggesting that it’s subversive, but at what point is an officer like, okay. Maybe I need to walk away from this situation because if I get photographs next to a person breaking glass, they identify me as OPD. This could now be a negative reflection or bridal real repute to the organization. Like, is there a point now that you have responsibility as an officer that, like, there’s laws being broken around you that you kind of, like, step away from that?...

Oakland City Planning Commission December 18, 2024

Tom Wong December 18, 2024 0

Transcript Good afternoon to our 1 guest in the room, but in addition, we do always have a TV audience. I will note that you can see we have a quorum of planning commissioners. We are waiting for our chair. It is 3 o’clock as soon as the chair is here and ready to start. This will be the December 18, 2024 Planning Commission. And if the 1 member of the audience would like to speak on any item you’re welcome to fill out a, card. It looks like you already have. And if you parked, and this is for the commission as well, if you parked in the garage at 250 Franco Gowa Plaza, you may use the promotion that the city offers for free parking, which is posted next to Hanifa. Thank you. Thank you, Catherine. All right. It is what? 302 and I will call the December 18th planning commission meeting to order. Let’s do a roll call. Alright. Commissioner Maurice Robb. Here. Commissioner Shahar Shirazi. Here. Commissioner Josie Aarons. Here. Commissioner Alex Randolph. Here. Vice chair Natalie Sandoval. Here. Each chair, Jennifer Rank. Here. You have a quorum. Thank you. Okay. So let’s go right to commission business. Is there any agenda discussion? No agenda discussion. Is there a director’s report? No director’s report. Any informational report? Oh, I sorry. I’m I thought that bylaws would be under information report. No information report. It’s actually further down on the agenda. Oh yeah. Gotcha. Okay. All right. So no committee reports. I don’t think any committees have. No committee has met since your last meeting. So that takes us to commission matters. Number 1, the, commission bylaws. Right. And, apologies. Yes. So we put this as number 1, so it’s identifiable on our webpage with, staff reports, etcetera, although it’s not specifically a public hearing. This is the, proposal which you’ve already seen once, the proposal to adopt new planning commission bylaws. And a reminder that first of all we’d like to thank Aaron Lemur who brought the draft bylaws to this body, quite a while ago. Aaron, I will note on the side, Aaron is actually not in the Bureau of Planning. He helped us out tremendously when we were significantly understaffed by taking on this project. He was also our, our Landmarks Board Secretary at that time. And so he while we have been working on staffing, Aaron held onto this project, which is to draft and work with you, the planning commission, to adopt bylaws, and the reason we had this as an important item over the past year you have bylaws but they’re pretty old and they do not allow for hybrid meetings. And the state has noted to all municipalities that in order to have hybrid meetings, we need every board and commission who would benefit from that. They must have bylaws that allow hybrid meetings. This was an opportunity to, look at our bylaws overall and improve them, make them more efficient, responsive to our times and how we actually operate. And Aaron brought the proposal to you again. I can’t I can’t exactly remember when May 15th May. And he heard your questions and he worked with the city attorney to revise the proposal and he’s bringing back a staff report with responses to your questions today on those proposed bylaws and our hope is that you will be willing to consider making a motion and approving those bylaws today. And with that, I know that Aaron Lehmer does have a presentation for you. Thank you. Thank you so much, Catherine. If we could get this slide up. Thank you so much. Yeah. And, good afternoon, chair rank and, commissioners. This is again the second reading of the proposed bylaws, for the planning commission and, just wanted to do a quick, recap of what they intend to do. Basically, they want to establish, you know, an updated framework for you all to conduct your business, and to conduct decision making. They wanna they wanna clarify roles and responsibilities, for both you as commissioners, and support staff, and they also clarify processes and procedures, for hosting hybrid meetings. And, lastly, they, help to clarify, processes that must be followed for remote or hybrid meetings. Going on, I’d like to, respond, to the, requests and some of the issues that were raised at the May 15th meeting, at the first reading of these bylaws. The first issue concerns the role of, the commission around reports. I believe it was, chair Shirazi, raised these, issue that there could be greater clarity around that particular point. And so, in the, article 2 duties of commission 4th bullet item, what we’ve done is, proposed to modify that language, basically to say that the commission shall also provide recommendations to be included in staff reports on subjects requested by the city administrator or the city council. So just to clarify that we are talking about staff reports, and that you would be making recommendations around those. So that’s the first, proposed, revision. Second, the issue around, when planning commissions may begin, hosting hybrid meetings here in Oakland. That, was raised by commissioner Sandoval noting that, hybrid meetings have also been, you know, underway at city council and that there have been, you know, staffing, done provisions made for those particular meetings. However, we wanted to kind of further clarify, I think, where we’re at with the planning commission, namely that in terms of readiness, we think that we need to meet at least, 3 key conditions. Number 1, having the appropriate technologies ready, installed, here at at city hall, which thanks to the great work of, KTOPS has already been done. Secondly, as Catherine was mentioning, we wanna make sure that the actual bylaws, which codify those processes are adopted by the commission. So that’s something you can, do here today. And thirdly, that there is, sufficient, city resources that are allocated to, fund support staff for the hosting of those hybrid meetings, particularly to make sure that, remote attendees can participate in an equal manner with respect to, in person participants during the course of those meetings. And so that would mean, you know, there would need to be the support staff that would be assigned, trained in those processes, and available during the course of regularly scheduled planning commission meetings using, Zoom or whatever comparable platform we have available. The 3rd issue that was, raised at the May 15th meeting, concerned the accessibility for persons with disabilities. And we think that there’s a natural place for, for including that within the bylaws under Article 3, meetings of the commission on page 3, paragraph 2, by adding the following language. All regular and special meetings of the Planning Commission should be open to the public and will be accessible to all persons in accordance with local, state and federal law. And lastly, we wanted to, I think, address a question that, commissioner Randolph had, posed around, you know, what commissioners can do to request to participate in remote meetings. And, staff just wanted to note that, you know, once the planning commission begins hosting hybrid meetings, then commissioners can check with the secretary or support staff, for further instructions on that process. And we just really wanted to note that, you know, there are there are only special circumstances under which those are allowed and those are, outlined in the city attorney’s frequently asked questions document that we included as attachment D in a supplement to the staff report. So, with that, again, I’ll just echo, I think, Catherine’s, urging that to move forward here with all of these processes, we really do need to have codified approved laws from you as the planning commission. And, if there are any questions concerning these and or the issues raised, please let us know. Thank you. Thanks, Aaron. Appreciate that. Are there any questions? No? All right. I will go ahead and open public comment. There’s no public comment for this item. I will close the public hearing and bring it back up for discussion. Is everyone, I’m guessing those that commented in May are satisfied. So so, does someone want to make a motion? We might, beat our record of the- at the last hearing. I can make a motion to approve, adopt the bylaws as revised. Motion by vice chair Sandoval. I’ll second the motion. And a second by, I was about to say chair, but commissioner Shirazi. Commissioner Robb. Yes. Commissioner Shirazi. Yes. Commissioner Arons. Yes. Commissioner Randolph. Yes. Vice chair Sandoval. Yes. Chair rank. Yes. Motion passes unanimously and these will be posted in a number of places on our planning commission web page. We will plaster it all over the website where appropriate. And we’ll keep them in our city files for use into the future. Thank you. Thank you. Thanks, Erin. Okay. Do we have a city attorney’s report? No city attorney’s report. Okay. Open forum. I’m guessing there are no speaker cards. Yes. We have 1 speaker....

Alameda City Council 12/17/2024

Tom Wong December 17, 2024 0

Transcript Are you ready? Okay. Good. Alright. Alright then. Good evening, everyone, and welcome to the city council of Alameda. Today is Tuesday, December 17, 2024. And, I’m about to call I am calling the meeting to order. And we’re gonna start with a special city council meeting, which is a closed session. And I would like to ask the city clerk, Laura Weisinger, to please call the roll at this time. Vice Mayor Jasag. Here. Council member Hara Spencer. Present. Mayor Ezea. Here. 3 present. And, hopefully, the other 2 council members will get here shortly. Hopefully. Alright. So at this time, we take public comment on closed session items only. Madam Cook, do you wanna introduce what those items are before we take the public comment? Performance evaluation and 3 b is potential litigation. Alright. Thank you. And do we have public comment? We do. Alright. Estella Villagrana. Welcome. Hello, everyone. I’m here in person for the first time. I tried to speak, on the phone a long time ago. And, the reason why I’m here is in my last intent to save my business, which is building 43 Winery. I am building 43 winery, not Todd. Todd is not building 43 winery. And my business is suffering and is about to be shut down by the city, leaded by the mayor because of what Todd doing in his personal or personal label. He’s doing whatever he’s doing, challenging the sequel against the city again in his personal level. So I met with city staff last week and my last intent or 1 of my intents to save my business. But it did, you know, seems to me that they didn’t have the power to offer any help, any support, and I’m here. I sent earlier a letter to all of you. So I just wanna make sure that you guys received the letter and you had the opportunity to read the letter or if you have a couple of minutes before you go into closed session to read that letter, do so, please. And I just hope that I get the same support from the city as Project Burger did at the time. And you all know the help that you guys give Project Burger because I was here when you guys made that decision. So I hope that I will get the same support, not less, from the city. Thank you. Thank you. Our next speaker, Todd Hickman. Welcome, speaker Hickman. So I’m just gonna talk today on what I’ve seen and how shameful I think it is the way that the city has treated Ms. Villagrana. Building 43, they’ve tried to get at me me and my personal hobbies of filing CEQA lawsuits. I mean I just love CEQA. I love the environment. It’s my own personal crusade. I love historic districts. I just can’t get enough of historic districts particularly military bases. It’s a big part of my life and it’s just, you know, how I’m gonna spend, the rest of my life is on being a historic, particularly with relation to, naval bases, a preservationist. And it’s just something that I’m enthralled with and something that I’m gonna do, so I’m not gonna be stopped. You know, I have, you know, several other, things that I do as well but, you know, Miss Viagrana, this is all that she has is this business it’s her business it’s not my business. So the way you’ve treated her the harassment what the mayor said publicly I mean quoted by the, Alameda Post, we have evidence of what she’s done through what I call her minions. These, public, participants in her crusade, to try and shut down building 43 and what she’s told them to do. The 100 of 1 star Yelp reviews, telling people how to get at us or try to get at me. And again, none of it really worked because I’m just picking up steam and now as you notice I’m more encouraged than ever. I’m just not gonna stop. And Mr. Shen, I mean, you know, I thought we were gonna be tight, you know, having a beer after work and stuff and you’ve just let me down. You failed to reign in the mayor. You failed to perform to your lawyer’s oath. You committed felonious fraud on 2 judges, a warrant representing the people of the state of California and inspection warrants as the municipal attorney, the landlord’s attorney, and you’re committing a felony telling a judge that you’re gonna represent the people of the state of California? Are you ******* kidding me, mister Shen? Are you ******* kidding me? My, oh, my. This has got a ******* stop up in here. Enough of this ****. You people have ******* lost concept with reality and how this really works. This is not how government service works. I’ve been there. I’ve been there. I’ve been on all sides of government service, and this is not how it works. So what you have done is scandalous. What you’ve done is illegal. What you’ve done, you are going to pay for. So I hope you’re smug. I hope you’ve had a good time sitting up there smirking. I hope you’ve had a real, real good time because the party’s coming to an end. Kinda like that, like that Natel party you had all scheduled, last week, you know, at the hearing, you know, that party you had all set up, all those people watching. And your time is up. Thank you. Our next speaker? We don’t have any more speakers. Okay. With that, we will close public comment on closed session items. And, we will adjourn to closed session to, consider the matters that do you wanna read them more fully? 3 a is public employee performance evaluation pursuant to government code section 54957. Positions evaluator city attorney Yves Shen. 3 b is conference with legal counsel potential litigation, potential initiation of litigation pursuant to government code section 5495.9 subsection D4. Number of cases 1 as plaintiff’s city initiating legal action. Potential defendant, Steel Town Winery, LLC DBA, Building 43 Winery. Thank you. Alright, everyone. We will be back by 6:15. Thank you. Okay. Everyone involved We’re good. And we’re good. Yeah. Oh, what’s that? I said a few things. You’re the 1 who didn’t hear that. All right. If everyone could, give us your attention. I am going to call the meeting back to order and good evening, everyone and welcome to the Alameda City Council meeting this evening is Tuesday, December 17, 2024, last City Council meeting of the year. And the City Council has just returned from closed session. And, I would like to start with the announcement of action taken in closed session. So on item 3A, which was public employee performance evaluation for the city attorney position, The council voted on the process that we will follow. It was a 4 to 1 vote with council member Herrera Spencer voting no. And then I will go on to the city clerk for the report out on item 3b. 3b which is regarding potential litigation. Staff provided information and council provided direction. Also by 4 ayes with council member Horace Spencer voting no. Alright. Thank you for that. And with that we will adjourn the, closed session. And I will call to order the special city council meeting. And I’d like to start with the pledge of allegiance. Council member Harris Spencer, may I call upon you to lead us in the pledge? To rise. Yes. You’re able. Ready to begin. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, 1 nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Thank you, council member Herrera Spencer. And, now we will go to roll call, madam clerk. Would you call the roll, please? Yes. Vice mayor Dason? Here. Council members Herrera Spencer? Present....

Oakland City Mayor’s Commission on Persons with Disabilities (MCPD) Meeting, December 16, 2024

Tom Wong December 16, 2024 0

Transcript Good evening. It is 5:37, December 18th or 16th. Sorry. And we will now begin our December session of the of mayor’s commission of people with disabilities. We’ll start with the in person meeting logistics and rules read out by staff. Okay. Remember, no food or open drink are allowed in here in room 1 to maintain a clean and professional environment. Drinks must be in a closed container, like Fatima has, to prevent any spills or accidents. When commissioners speak, please press the top red button that says Mike. And when you are finished, please press the button again. To ensure clarity and transparency, when commissioners speak, please state your name before speaking. When a member of the audience is speaking or commenting, please first state your name and any affiliations you may have. Restrooms are located outside here in room 1 near the elevators. We will now move on to roll call and determination of quorum. Here. Vice chair, part 2. Here. Commissioner Cloyd. Here. Commissioner Rowe. Commissioner Foote. Here. Commissioner Creswell. Commissioner Wilson. Here. Commissioner Saint Julian. Here. Commissioner Arey. Here. Commissioner Carter. Here. And with that, we do make quorum. Oh, nice. Perfect timing. Alright. Well, can I share that it was here too? Okay. And with that, we definitely make quorum. We’ll now move on to item 3, open forum. Any person may directly address the commission on any items within the jurisdiction of the commission not on the agenda for today. Speakers wishing to address a specific item on the agenda may do so when invited at the time the item is being considered. There’s no discussion allowed during open forum. Please raise your hand if you wish to comment and wait to be called on. Which 1? It doesn’t matter? Okay. I think it’s this 1. Yeah. Hi, everybody. Lenore Gunst. I am Lenore Gunst, and I chair the mayor’s commission on aging. And it’s, a pleasure to be back here to see you all, although I wish the circumstances were less dire than they are. As you may know, the city is in a fiscal crisis. And, as a result of that, the city council tomorrow will be making, a decision about implementing some mid cycle budget reductions, which will have a drastic, really, severe impact on seniors, persons with disabilities, and veterans who live in the city of Oakland and utilize, Oakland’s, senior services. So of the people that attend, sir, use the services most and attend the senior centers, are mostly low income people and people of color. So it’s an equity issue, and it’s also, critical services that a lot seniors rely on, for for their safety and well-being. And among the probably the biggest 1 is the closure of the senior centers. We had a meeting last week and, and have attended every hearing, and have been advocating on your behalf as well as senior’s behalf. And, we were just shocked when we learned that, that a set of, well, the city administrator proposed a set of cuts and and did so, saying he had the confidence of the, directors of all the departments in adult and aging services and human services, who had, offered these cuts as being something that they could live with. And that really was not the case. Adult and Aging Services had not been consulted. And this included, rotating actually, I heard a question about the the centers, not opening West Oakland right away. It’s still under construction apparently. But, the other centers would have 1 center director and they would, this person would rotate among the the 3 others that are open, and it would be open 1 day a week. So Oakland’s a big city. It’s hard enough to get around and I’m sure I’m preaching to the choir about that, but, you know, to get from West Oakland out to East Oakland, for 1 day a week, it just isn’t tenable. Not only that, but they’re, the downtown Oakland Senior Center, for instance, is the, head start program runs there. The veterans administration runs out of there. Essential programs like, case management. All transportation and script is available at, for people that need help to get to doctor’s appointments and all are, available at the senior centers, as well as meal and food distribution. So, we have been lobbying very hard for, an alternative plan or at least, something that that, would mitigate the impact to seniors and persons with disabilities and veterans. We are hopeful that tomorrow at the at the meeting that, we will have gotten our message through. We have just had tireless efforts. So last week, we had an opportunity to meet with the city administrator. And, and we had a rousing meeting. We had buses come and pick seniors up from all the senior centers and brought them there. Over a 100 folks were there. And, he did acknowledge at the end of that meeting that there was still time to see whether or not they couldn’t mitigate some of the impacts that they were anticipating. So, we’ll see. So tomorrow, we have a rally. And, so we’re not just gonna take that for an answer. We’re gonna go the to the end, to the end of the line here with everything we’ve got. So it will be out at Fracagawa Plaza, and it’s going to start just before the city council meeting starts at 3:30. So we’ll be out there at about 2:30. And, Anwar is going to be speaking. We have, folks from Mercy Brown Bag, from SOS Meals on Wheels, from the Senior Services Coalition. We are hoping, very hopeful. We’re gonna have somebody from, supervisor Nate Miley’s office will be there, United Seniors of Oakland, and, we’re hoping 1 of the council members will come out as well. We know we know at least 2 or 3 that are really sympathizing with us. But, you know, fire and police are important, and that seems to be where the city has, has really hedged in terms of being able to cut too much of those resources. They’re union they’re big union jobs, and so, you know, that’s another complication in in the works. But seniors are important. You know, we’re the fiber of, I think, of Oakland. And, we take advantage of what Oakland has to offer, and we’ve lived and worked here for, for many for their whole lives, and people wanna stay. And the senior centers play an important role in that, as do senior services, as do all of you. So, so I’m here just to give you that update. We’re gonna have we’re kind of waiting out with bated breath to see what happens tomorrow. There it will be the last opportunity. You know, in addition to all that, the over half the city council’s turning over, including the mayor. So, so, you know, we’ll be back at it in the beginning of the year, virtually starting over with our advocacy and relationship building with, several of the council members. But, it’s all worthwhile. So, so anyway, I just wanna give you that update. I wanna thank you very much for your support. Come on out tomorrow if you can’t. If you do have a relationship with a council member, you know, shooting an email, there’ll be public comment available, during the meeting. You can submit a a card if you come in person. It may be too late to do it on, any comment, but, certainly, you can just email council members if they get them and just let them know that, that you really support, not closing the senior centers and retaining some of the, some of the other programs that seniors rely on. So any questions at all? Yes. You spoke of well, I know the West Oakland 1 was closed. I know a lot of people that used to go there. So you said they remodel, and they couldn’t be remodeling if there’s no money. So what are they doing with it? Yeah. So there’s something called, carryovers, in the budget, and most of those are for capital improvement projects. So, so construction is well underway. And, so yeah. I know. It’s kind of a slippery slope there. There is money. I mean, there’s money. Oakland’s got money, but, you know, a lot of it is not discretionary. It’s it’s restricted in how it’s used. And a lot of I think a lot of the the concern that the city councils, had, in their decision making is that the fiscal, where the city ends up in all of this will, will certainly impact their credit rating. So the city floats bonds to finance a lot of the capital improvement projects. You know, I live on Broadway Terrace. The road has not been paved in 50 years or something. It’s, you know, it’s there’s other, infrastructure improvements and all that. So the funding for those are, those funds are earmarked and they’re there. But, yeah. Right? You’d think that we would take care of Oakland’s most vulnerable people first before some of these other, you know, projects and things, get taken on. But, Do you have any excuse me. Would do you have any idea which one’s closing or just? Well, they would all, right now, they were all gonna close. So last last Tuesday, we learned, like, that they were eliminating 6 and a half positions out of adult and aging services, and we pressed and pressed and pressed to find out what they were, and staff didn’t even know what they were. And it turned out it was all the senate directors. Is Oakland the only 1 that’s broke, or is it just, you know, is it just the Bay Area period? Is it just Oakland? That’s a good question....

Alameda City Public Art Commission 12/16/2024

Tom Wong December 16, 2024 0

Transcript You may also submit written comments to me by emailing me at jkeliiaa atalamedaca.gov. Comments submitted during the meeting before the conclusion of public comments section will be read into record. My email address is also on the meeting’s agenda. If a remote participant is having difficulty, I suggest that you call using the number 669-444-9171, and meeting ID 896-4208 1044. This information is also at the top of the agenda. People participating via telephone have to please press star 9 to raise your hand, and star 6 to unmute. For For in person participation, a speaker slip must be submitted to speak on any item. There are speaker slips located over there on the chair with with pins. If the commissioner would like to speak, please physically raise your hand, and the chair will acknowledge your request. That chat function has been turned off. Alright. Thank you. Okay. The meeting is now called to order. The time is 6:0:5 pm. Roll call. Commissioner Liz Rush? Present. Commissioner Robert Ferguson? Present. Commissioner Peter Plotsgumer? Present. Commissioner Lisa Martin, absent. Commissioner James Martin, absent. Staff members, Jackie, present. And Duane Dahlman. Present. All right. Hey, comments from the audience may concern matters either on or not on the agenda, but must deal with matters subject to the jurisdiction of the Public Arts Commission. Comments will be limited to 3 minutes. Comments concerning matters on this evening’s agenda will be heard when that item is called. Halia’a, do you have any items to read into the record? Public comments? Yes. I do have a public comment from Rachel Campos de Ivanoff. And rate oh, sorry. You can actually come over here and speak because we would like to for your comments to be recorded. This guy? What are you so you’re in the as long as you’re in the, the frame, you can you can speak here. Hi. Rachel Campos de Eignoff. I am a board member of the Westin Earth District, and I’m also staff for Radium. And Jeff wanted to share a quick update about a wonderful event that we hosted this past weekend, which was called Capture the King Tides. This was a collaborative effort with Westin Arts District, Radium, NASA, Greenbelt Alliance. We braved the wind, the rain, power outfits. Wow. 40 mile an hour away and miraculously 25 people showed up for a free iPhone photography workshop. And it was a wonderful collaboration of being able to highlight through an artistic lens the work that the city is doing, for climate adaptation. So this was a quick pop up event that we did as part of the rising tides project and as a warm up to, a bigger initiative that would be coming in May called In Plain Sight that will be happening at Radium, which is again, also part of the Rising Tides initiative. So that program will be scheduled starting May 9th for about 3 weeks. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Okay. Raise your hand if you’d like to provide public comments unrelated to an item on the agenda. Is there anyone else who wishes to speak? All right. That brings us to the regular agenda. Okay. Which is to review and approve the October 21st, draft pack minutes. Commissioners? No objection. Okay. That is approved as written. Do you have any other motion? Yeah. I think we do. Yes. I motion we approve the minutes as written. Okay. Okay. Approve. K. Review and approve the September 18th draft packed minutes. I have no changes. Because I think I’m barking too much in these briefings. I motion to, approve, the Minutes as written. Great. Both are done. All right. All right. Regular agenda items. First up, Alameda Recreational and Parks Department, Aquatic Park, Public Art Opportunity Presentation. Yes, please. And then I’m gonna go ahead and share our screen. Off the screen. And make sure you introduce yourself. I will. My name is Patrick Ressy. I am the recreation manager. I’m also joined by Stacy Thomas, a aquatic specialist, in our department. Well, I want to thank you guys all for coming out and listening to this presentation. I think it’s gonna be really great opportunity for the Public Art Commission. Little known fact, the Public Art Commission did start in the recreation department when it first started. Many, many years ago. In fact, I was the staff person in charge of it back then. So, so as you may or may not know, hopefully, you do know that we are going to be creating a new first ever Alameda Aquatic Center, in on the footprint of what is the Gene Sweeney open space preserved park. It’s, we’ve never had a facility in Alameda. We’ve always shared facility with the school district or with other nonprofits. So we’re quite excited to finally have a facility that we can use, as much as possible. Because when for many years, we only had access to pools, for 8 weeks during the summer. And now we are going, year round. Especially COVID kinda changed things and opens the world up to alternative schedules. And so now we’re we have an aquatic need to go year round. People wanna swim year round. They wanna use it as exercise. So, like, so we’re really excited. And it’s most exciting is this is gonna be an all electric 0 greenhouse gas emission demonstration project that, we’re working with, many city departments, especially AMP, who’s gonna be helping, do some demonstration, things out of the facility. So we’ll provide it. So if you’re familiar with Gene Sweeney, it’s a 26 Acre Park. This is the far West side of Gene Sweeney Park, on the corner of Constitution and Atlantic is that’s where you see the Atlantic up there. So the that is what it currently exists there now. I don’t think it looks as nice as that, but, that’s, what exists there now. We do have some public art there already. If you look down below, right above the Gene Sweeney, there is a, right there. Thank you. Is the, Mormon, California, the tides of California, Mesa California, totem poles that are there. Mhmm. Gene Sweeney actually does have several, public art pieces in it, which is super nice, and I think, adds to the element of the park. So, that’s the footprint of what’s going to become the aquatic center, but now let’s see what the vision is for the aquatic center. So that’s what the aquatic that space is going to occupy. We are quite excited about it, and we’ve had lots of we’ve had many, many, many public meetings and, many, debates back and forth about what what how it was gonna come out. And so this was very, very publicly vetted. And we feel that this is is the best, facility that we’re gonna move forward with. And this is the 1 that we’re we’re getting designs out with, and eventually we’ll have an RFP going out, hopefully next year at some point. Right? Tracy. So what I do think though, if you see that, it it lends itself for a great opportunity for some public art to be infused into the project. And if you click to the next slide, is we we kind of identified some areas that will be really great opportunities. We anticipate over a 175 to 200000 people coming to this facility, each year. So it’s gonna be highly visible. And I think it’ll be a great opportunity to showcase public art. And it also gives an opportunity, in my personal opinion to give, 1 of the major thoroughfares of Alameda, some sort of gateway art piece that I think has been missing. So that the 1 on the far left where it says gateway, that is, again, it’s it’s a little bit farther away from the facility....

Alameda City Planning Board 12/16/2024

Tom Wong December 16, 2024 0

Transcript And we’re calling the meeting to order at exactly 7 o’clock. We’ll go ahead and do the flag salute. Board member Luis, can you lead us, please? Yes, sir. I pledge allegiance to the flag of all, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Okay. And moving on to the agenda, item number 1, roll call. Good evening. Board member Hamm? Here. Board member Hsu? Here. Board member Ruiz? Here. Board member Bridal? Here. Board member Wang? Here. Board member Suhayba? Present. And president Cisneros? Here. We, have a quorum. All are present. Okay. Great. Thank you. Next agenda item is agenda changes. Anyone from the board or staff, any proposed, changes? Seeing none, we’ll keep it as is. Item number 3, non agenda public items. If anyone from the public would like to speak on an item that’s not on the agenda, you’re welcome to come up now and speak for 3 minutes. Are there any speakers? I don’t have any speaker slips, and I don’t see any hands raised on Zoom. Okay. Thank you. Moving on to agenda item number 4, consent calendar. We have the draft meeting minutes. If, there’s any items that need to be pulled, now is the opportunity to do so. No? I’m not seeing any. Okay. I will note I will note there were 3, members absent from the meeting, and so, the 4 of you that were there could vote to approve the minutes. Okay, great. I should open it up for public comment, right? Any public comments on the consent calendar item? Seeing none. Okay. Does, anyone want to make a motion? I can move to approve. Okay. And, I’ll abstain. Well, I’ll second the motion. Okay, great. All those in favor? Aye. Aye. I’ll abstain to. Oppose abstentions? Yes, I abstention. Okay. All right. Motion carries. Okay. Great. Moving on to regular agenda items. 5 a, which is, the update is a workshop on the update for the Alameda Point EIR, design guidelines for new infill development. ESSF presentation. Good evening, President Cisneros and members of the planning board. Brian Maguire, planner 2 here to present, essentially a staff update, but we wanted to agendize this to give the board a chance to, provide any comments and the public a chance to comment since we did some work on this item earlier this year, on the EIR requirement to adopt guidelines for new infill development within the NAS Alameda Historic District. A little bit of background. Back in February 2014, the city council approved the Alameda Point project. This involved 4 key actions, to guide the reuse and redevelopment of the base. Certified the final environmental impact report, adopted a general plan amendment, adopted the Alameda Point zoning code as well as a master infrastructure plan for Alameda Point. The EIR lays out mitigation measures to reduce the severity of impacts, environmental impacts, when possible. 1 such EIR mitigation requires that the city adopt guidelines for new infill development prior to constructing new buildings within the historic district. There are many, many in-depth high quality reports and plans by both the Navy and the city, over the years that contain contain guidance for consideration when adding new buildings and other development in the historic district. Most relevant to tonight’s discussion are the 1997 guide to preserving the character of the NAS Alameda Historic District, commonly referred to as the guide, and the 20 2012 cultural landscape reports. Earlier this year, staff began developing draft infill design guidelines in consultation primarily with the HAB but also the planning board. At the same time, we were reviewing the early plans for the performing arts center project, which we’ll hear more about later. After that separate deep dive into the, existing reports and guidelines, it’s become clear that already adopted guidelines are sufficient for complying with the EIR mitigation requirement. Thanks to previous Navy conveyance requirements when they gave us the land, in 1999, the city was required to formally adopt the guide as city policy and then in 2013, this is sort of, you know, I call it sort of the lost resolution. It, happened before the Alameda Point project was approved but, after the federal nomination, in the wake of that nomination, the city council was required to amend the 1997 guide to include 20 pages of design review guidelines for the historic design landscape excerpted from the cultural landscape report, which is Exhibit 1 attached to your staff report. That action is key because it upgraded the guide to include infill design guidelines for new buildings. Previously the guide mostly focused on the reuse and rehabilitation of the existing in the historic district. So that brings us back to 2014, and the approval of the Alameda Point project. At the same time the EIR was certified city council adopted the Alameda Point zoning district rules which included this provision called NES Alameda Historic District guidelines. It requires all new construction in the historic district to be consistent with the guide as amended. If you didn’t know about that 2013 resolution, you might, that as amended part might go unnoticed like it did for me for a while. Since the guide to preserving the character was amended a full year before the certification of the EIR and adoption of the zoning ordinance, it was not immediately clear to current staff, hi, that the infill design guidelines from the cultural landscape report had already been formally adopted into the Alameda Point zoning code. By incorporating the amended guide directly into the zoning, city council ensured compliance with this mitigation measure from the start. So where does that leave us? For the Waterfront Town Center and Main Street neighborhoods shown in pink and purple here, we have adopted specific plans to augment the underlying design guidelines from the cultural landscape report and the guide. For the adaptive reuse district shown in green here, there’s not currently a specific plan. Most of the contributing buildings from the historic district are here as well as character defining features of the historic landscape like the the the mall sort of in front of City Hall West, the large parade grounds, I believe they’re mostly referred to as. So we’re likely to see much less infill development in this area. Most of what we’ll see would be the reuse of existing buildings like storehouse lofts you saw last week, things like the Almanac and Rake, Firebrand and Kairos type projects. As for the work that was started this year, trying to create a guide to the guides, so to speak. Staff will continue to work on creating a user friendly, visually attractive tool as part of our work program and bring that back to you at some point in the future. I’m happy to answer any questions, hear public comment, take any additional feedback you might have tonight. We’re not asking for any action as part of this update. Great. Thank you much for the presentation. Before we open up for public comment, any clarifying questions from the board? Seeing none, thank you so much. I’ll open up for public comment. Any speakers? I don’t see any hands raised, and I don’t have any speaker slips on this item. Okay. Great. Closing, public comment, and, go ahead and open up to the board for any, comments or, feedback regarding this update. Board member Holmes. Yeah. Yeah. Thank you. Thank you for the staff report. And I couldn’t understand how complex this issue is. I don’t give you a Give you a Yeah. A lot of pages. Yeah. Yeah. A lot of different documents. This is more a question if I try to ask it, I guess, under questions. But based on the staff report and what your presentation, covered, it sounds like the cultural landscape report, the guidelines that were adopted into the zoning code, those are the primary guideline that covers all of Alameda Point. And then there’s specific guidelines related to each specific plan that might be like a supplemental or that they’re kind of they pertain to a smaller geographical area, project specific guidelines. What about the state, historic, guidelines? Are those incorporated or reflected in the cultural guidelines at all? Or they another set of guidelines that that the city needs to be aware of that is in addition to the cultural landscape guidelines? Are you referring to, like, the secretary of interior standards? Yeah. Yeah. The yeah. Secretary of interior standards also SHPO standards. So are those incorporated by reference or otherwise into the cultural landscape guidelines? I I defer to Steve on the SHPO aspect of it. I think the secretary of interior standards, I I can confidently say, are, guidelines that we’re required to follow when, taking on projects that within the historic district. In order to get a certificate of approval from the historical advisory board, they have to find that it’s consistent with those guidelines, but anything you wanna add to that? No, that’s right. I, it’s it’s, 1 of the mitigation measures, which again is a little confusing because then it’s also just put in the zoning code. When the zoning was adopted, they just threw everything into the code as a as a development standard....

Alameda City Mayor’s Economic Development Advisory Panel/Economic Recovery Task Force 12/11/2024

Tom Wong December 11, 2024 0

Transcript Agenda item for oral communication public. If the public would like to comment on an item, please email Eric Fonstein at efonstein@alamedaca.gov. Comments submitted during the meeting before the conclusion of the public comment section will be read into the record. If the public would like to comment and has called in by phone, please dial 9 to raise your hand. Comments from the audience may concern matters either on or not on the agenda, but must deal with matters subject to the jurisdiction of the mayor’s economic development advisory panel. Comments will be limited to 3 minutes. Comments concerning matters on this evening’s agenda will be heard when that item is called. Eric, do we have any speakers or comments? So far, no. It’s, even though it looks like we don’t have any questions. It’s not easy. Yeah. Which brings us to the consent calendar. We have nothing on the consent calendar, so we’ll move to regular agenda items. Tonight’s agenda item 6 a is an update on the Alameda Point Piers and the Alameda Maritime BlueTech strategy. Before I turn it over to Abby, just a reminder on how we proceed. First, Abby will give a staff presentation followed by clarifying questions from from the panel, followed by public comment. And then at the close of public comment, there’ll be a time for a panel member discussion. Abby? Thank you. Good evening, everybody. I’m pleased to be here and I’m very pleased to have a special guest speaker tonight presenting on the Pierist and Maritime Strategy, Ron Golomb. Ron has been an economic and real estate consultant for and and well, in the economic and real estate world for many, many years. Most recently was the director of, real estate real estate at VTA down in the South Bay, and was a long for a long, long time, consulted at Bay Area Economics before then and is now hung out on some shingle very luckily for us. So we have a lot of really decent real estate and economics experience. And Ron has been doing a lot of background analysis that he’ll present to you tonight, for our discussion. So you wanna take it away, Ron? I will. Thank you. I’m gonna say it here. Say it. Say it again. Okay. We could do it then. Second here. I need to my machine will be in sync here. Okay. Okay. So thank you for the time introduction. As I already mentioned, I’ve been working for about 3 decades in creating public private partnerships, really advanced economic development as well as sort of, brutalization. And I’ve worked on about a half dozen base closure projects. So it’s a lot of, interesting experience along the way. Who put this in the presentation? I see it’s not a PDF. Right? Sorry. No. That’s Hi. Good. So what we’d like to do tonight is and what you saw in the packet is, you saw both the staff report and then you saw the detailed draft, strategy for maritime and blue tech uses that’s prepared by Geis Hommerston. So what I’m gonna do is go ahead and kind of give a very high level overview and then really post some questions that hopefully will set the stage. And, obviously, what we’re excited about is really getting your input and expertise to help us think about how to sharpen the thinking that we’re doing and the work that we’re doing. So what I’m gonna talk about tonight are gonna be the opportunities for the peers of waterfront at Avian Point. I’m gonna touch on the challenges that we have because of the conditions and flooding needs. I’m gonna talk about some of the potential strategies to advance maritime fleet type uses. And I do wanna note that while we’re focused on the working waterfront, which you see on the graphic that we have here, as well as what we’re calling sort of a maritime blue tech area behind it, where we have a number of tenants in the maritime center already, this area is adjacent to the enterprise district. And, obviously, there’s also opportunities we think for synergies between what’s envisioned for the enterprise district and really those types of businesses and what’s happening here. And so, again, what this is really all about is getting your guidance, to help shape our thinking about what should be the priorities and actions that have to be taken. We have a good sign on. That’s the challenge is now we have to figure that out. Is this development, can I ask a question? How do I do that? Is this, the development of a new specific plan or an additional specific plan for Illumina Point? Or I think at this point, it’s not so much a land use exercise in terms of thinking about specific plan. It’s really more on strategy in terms of economic development, which is what are the kinds of uses we wanna track? What’s the sector that we wanna try to create and build upon here? And so it’s really a little focus in that direction. That’s not to say that there wouldn’t be perhaps a specific line down the road, but I think we’re a little bit early in the process than that. Can I augment a little bit, that that it’s really more of an investment sort of at some point the city is going to have to make financial decisions about the pier? So it’s an investment plan, but also I think policy decisions that Ron will go over that are not yet, as LeBron said, not land use, but more of just just more real estate policy. So that’s more of the feedback we’re looking for as we get. Great. So I think a good place to start is really to think about what is the competitive advantage that was Alameda? And, you know, it doesn’t say it very simply, what we have at Alameda Point, which is Okay. Which is, you know, there’s there’s only a few number of place to be here that have this, but we have a working waterfront that’s able to accommodate various maritime uses. We don’t have a facility that’s foreign in towards cargo like Port of Oakland, but we do have a facility that’s a lot of really support a broad range of other maritime, cable tech activities. The fact that we’re adjacent to the Port of Oakland is a huge advantage in terms of support activities that cannot be accounted important and have been here in the past. The fact that we’re also on the other side of Alameda Point from base shipping yacht, from a functioning working shipyard that works with all kinds of garment and fire ships is also another big advantage. This is not something we’re talking about creating from scratch. We already have a dozen maritime blue tech tenants at Alameda Point, so we have a cluster here already. This is really a discussion about how we grow and expand the cluster cluster to really help fulfill goals for for Alameda Point. And it’s also worth noting that we have available buildings and sites that are both available for reuse as well as new development. And really and this is where it ties into the city’s economic development strategic plan. This is about how can we support the city’s goals for job and business creation and workforce development when we think there’s real opportunities in maritime, in Bluetech sector. The graphic you see shows, well, simply, in peers 1, 2, and 3. Although, obviously, we have significant current uses such as the USS Hornet, you can see him in peer 3, power engineering at peer 1. Pier 2 is not in use at all. I’ll sort of have that more embedded. But we have some pretty substantial unused per assets. And as you can see in line with that, we have a pretty fair amount of land in our buildings. And, of course, we have the the SF Ferry, formerly known as WIDA. We have their maintenance and operations facility. So just to talk briefly about what we have already happening at, Alameda Point. So maritime needs to include merit, not the shifts, but some warehouse and support activities they have. NASA navigation, we have Banner Sea Republic Services that supports, maritime, firms. We have power engineering, you know, we have the asset Bay Fair. We also have some significant recreational waterfront uses, the US Department Museum, the LME Utility Center, as well as Tech Adventure. And then BluTech, which I’ll talk about in a minute, but really more research and development oriented uses that we have, including door marine, mangrove boats, Kite Concepts, and Pansail drone. And these are facilities that only use the piers at Alameda, but they’re actually using the seaplane, specifically the seaplane, ramps as well as the small dock that’s over there. So the images on the right are really trying to show 2 things. On the upper image is really giving you another view to show you the piers and the relationships, the land, and the the buildings that are cut up behind them. And in all, we have about half dozen buildings, and we have 20 acres of land that could potentially support a broad range of maritime, and and blue tech activities. How far east does the land area extend for this? For discussion, really, if you look at kind of Orion Street here, this is the dividing line where these are really maritime blue tech uses that are on this side of of Rhine Street, whereas on this area, on the other side of Rhine, it’s really Enterprise District. And if you saw the city council presentation a couple months ago, that was when the boundary tour was talked about parcels and phasing. But I also wanna touch on another issue that’s really significant for this, and that’s the public lands, public trust restrictions. So as true in all of our products in California, what you see in this area, midshaded green, I realize it’s a little bit weak, but you can see the areas that identify as part of the public trust where there’s actually restrictions on what can go to those areas. And those restrictions are really oriented towards preserving, you know, maritime uses, public access, and so on. And so really about 6 acres of the area we’re talking about is already in the public trust. In a lot of ways, and this is kind of 1 of the considerations, is that 1 of the challenges that we appoint is that per policy, you know, the city really has to get fair market value for when it’s supposed to properties because the need raised funding for infrastructure or if it has to happen to to allow the plan to be implemented. When you look in this area, because of the use restriction on maritime because of public trust, that actually supports lower land value. Since a lot of ways, it kind of also makes this area a better fit for a lot of maritime and BlueTech uses because it really does support lower value than potentially lower rent than you would than the sea would have to realize in the parts of of that viewpoint per the current policies. So I’ve talked about the piers in waterfront, but as I mentioned, it’s also worth noting what’s happening with Seaplane View. And, you know, the key thing about the Seaplane View is that and this goes back to the current plan from your point. This is the area that’s really seen as public access to public faces with a lot of uses They’re focusing public activity here to really protect the piers and more working waterfront environment that is not necessarily as as open or as accessible by the public. So going back to the town center and waterfront precise plans that are adopted, the eastern side is envisioned as, this area here is envisioned as a mixed use urban waterfront development. So basically, think about mixed use residential with ground floor chimney voices. Pardon? No. You touched that. Can you dance? Oh, sorry about that. Oh, sorry about that. Hang on. Oh, boy. So what I see here is really, mixed use development where you have, you know, retail, restaurants, commercial activities, and places plugged into the waterfront with residential use of weather. On the north side, you have new new waterfront product. I’m sure you see the first piece there that was part of parcel layout. You have a new urban waterfront, that really is kind of a public area for people to enjoy the And, obviously, part of that is gonna be thinking about how to preserve the use of the seaplane ramp by the tenants who are in the hangars. What you also see in this graphic, and the rest is a little washed up here, is what the plant envisions is additional development between that waterfront pond and the existing hangars. And then finally, on the western side, what you see is kind of all goals for habitat restoration and passive recreation. So now I’m gonna get to the nitty gritty bouts, really the challenge that we face here. When we talk about sort of the piers in the waterfront area, we have some really substantial costs for both improvements and repairs and ongoing operations. The city simply doesn’t have the funds to to cover. The graph that you see here is a picture of a damaged pile at Pier 2. You can see the pile shear. There’s a lot of these at Pier 2, which is why it’s been closed to large ships there. Lesser issues than the other piers, but, you know, I think as folks appreciate, the maritime environment is an incredibly corrosive environment. And anything that is in the water requires a lot of ongoing maintenance to really be, say, in an operating condition....