Alameda City Planning Board 12/16/2024
Transcript And we're calling the meeting to order at exactly 7 o'clock. We'll go ahead and do the flag salute. Board member Luis, can you lead us, please? Yes, sir. I pledge allegiance to the flag of all, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Okay. And moving on to the agenda, item number 1, roll call. Good evening. Board member Hamm? Here. Board member Hsu? Here. Board member Ruiz? Here. Board member Bridal? Here. Board member Wang? Here. Board member Suhayba? Present. And president Cisneros? Here. We, have a quorum. All are present. Okay. Great. Thank you. Next agenda item is agenda changes. Anyone from the board or staff, any proposed, changes? Seeing none, we'll keep it as is. Item number 3, non agenda public items. If anyone from the public would like to speak on an item that's not on the agenda, you're welcome to come up now and speak for 3 minutes. Are there any speakers? I don't have any speaker slips, and I don't see any hands raised on Zoom. Okay. Thank you. Moving on to agenda item number 4, consent calendar. We have the draft meeting minutes. If, there's any items that need to be pulled, now is the opportunity to do so. No? I'm not seeing any. Okay. I will note I will note there were 3, members absent from the meeting, and so, the 4 of you that were there could vote to approve the minutes. Okay, great. I should open it up for public comment, right? Any public comments on the consent calendar item? Seeing none. Okay. Does, anyone want to make a motion? I can move to approve. Okay. And, I'll abstain. Well, I'll second the motion. Okay, great. All those in favor? Aye. Aye. I'll abstain to. Oppose abstentions? Yes, I abstention. Okay. All right. Motion carries. Okay. Great. Moving on to regular agenda items. 5 a, which is, the update is a workshop on the update for the Alameda Point EIR, design guidelines for new infill development. ESSF presentation. Good evening, President Cisneros and members of the planning board. Brian Maguire, planner 2 here to present, essentially a staff update, but we wanted to agendize this to give the board a chance to, provide any comments and the public a chance to comment since we did some work on this item earlier this year, on the EIR requirement to adopt guidelines for new infill development within the NAS Alameda Historic District. A little bit of background. Back in February 2014, the city council approved the Alameda Point project. This involved 4 key actions, to guide the reuse and redevelopment of the base. Certified the final environmental impact report, adopted a general plan amendment, adopted the Alameda Point zoning code as well as a master infrastructure plan for Alameda Point. The EIR lays out mitigation measures to reduce the severity of impacts, environmental impacts, when possible. 1 such EIR mitigation requires that the city adopt guidelines for new infill development prior to constructing new buildings within the historic district. There are many, many in-depth high quality reports and plans by both the Navy and the city, over the years that contain contain guidance for consideration when adding new buildings and other development in the historic district. Most relevant to tonight's discussion are the 1997 guide to preserving the character of the NAS Alameda Historic District, commonly referred to as the guide, and the 20 2012 cultural landscape reports. Earlier this year, staff began developing draft infill design guidelines in consultation primarily with the HAB but also the planning board. At the same time, we were reviewing the early plans for the performing arts center project, which we'll hear more about later. After that separate deep dive into the, existing reports and guidelines, it's become clear that already adopted guidelines are sufficient for complying with the EIR mitigation requirement. Thanks to previous Navy conveyance requirements when they gave us the land, in 1999, the city was required to formally adopt the guide as city policy and then in 2013, this is sort of, you know, I call it sort of the lost resolution. It, happened before the Alameda Point project was approved but, after the federal nomination, in the wake of that nomination, the city council was required to amend the 1997 guide to include 20 pages of design review guidelines for the historic design landscape excerpted from the cultural landscape report, which is Exhibit 1 attached to your staff report. That action is key because it upgraded the guide to include infill design guidelines for new buildings. Previously the guide mostly focused on the reuse and rehabilitation of the existing in the historic district. So that brings us back to 2014, and the approval of the Alameda Point project. At the same time the EIR was certified city council adopted the Alameda Point zoning district rules which included this provision called NES Alameda Historic District guidelines. It requires all new construction in the historic district to be consistent with the guide as amended. If you didn't know about that 2013 resolution, you might, that as amended part might go unnoticed like it did for me for a while. Since the guide to preserving the character was amended a full year before the certification of the EIR and adoption of the zoning ordinance, it was not immediately clear to current staff, hi, that the infill design guidelines from the cultural landscape report had already been formally adopted into the Alameda Point zoning code. By incorporating the amended guide directly into the zoning, city council ensured compliance with this mitigation measure from the start. So where does that leave us? For the Waterfront Town Center and Main Street neighborhoods shown in pink and purple here, we have adopted specific plans to augment the underlying design guidelines from the cultural landscape report and the guide. For the adaptive reuse district shown in green here, there's not currently a specific plan. Most of the contributing buildings from the historic district are here as well as character defining features of the historic landscape like the the the mall sort of in front of City Hall West, the large parade grounds, I believe they're mostly referred to as. So we're likely to see much less infill development in this area. Most of what we'll see would be the reuse of existing buildings like storehouse lofts you saw last week, things like the Almanac and Rake, Firebrand and Kairos type projects. As for the work that was started this year, trying to create a guide to the guides, so to speak. Staff will continue to work on creating a user friendly, visually attractive tool as part of our work program and bring that back to you at some point in the future. I'm happy to answer any questions, hear public comment, take any additional feedback you might have tonight. We're not asking for any action as part of this update. Great. Thank you much for the presentation. Before we open up for public comment, any clarifying questions from the board? Seeing none, thank you so much. I'll open up for public comment. Any speakers? I don't see any hands raised, and I don't have any speaker slips on this item. Okay. Great. Closing, public comment, and, go ahead and open up to the board for any, comments or, feedback regarding this update. Board member Holmes. Yeah. Yeah. Thank you. Thank you for the staff report. And I couldn't understand how complex this issue is. I don't give you a Give you a Yeah. A lot of pages. Yeah. Yeah. A lot of different documents. This is more a question if I try to ask it, I guess, under questions. But based on the staff report and what your presentation, covered, it sounds like the cultural landscape report, the guidelines that were adopted into the zoning code, those are the primary guideline that covers all of Alameda Point. And then there's specific guidelines related to each specific plan that might be like a supplemental or that they're kind of they pertain to a smaller geographical area, project specific guidelines. What about the state, historic, guidelines? Are those incorporated or reflected in the cultural guidelines at all? Or they another set of guidelines that that the city needs to be aware of that is in addition to the cultural landscape guidelines? Are you referring to, like, the secretary of interior standards? Yeah. Yeah. The yeah. Secretary of interior standards also SHPO standards. So are those incorporated by reference or otherwise into the cultural landscape guidelines? I I defer to Steve on the SHPO aspect of it. I think the secretary of interior standards, I I can confidently say, are, guidelines that we're required to follow when, taking on projects that within the historic district. In order to get a certificate of approval from the historical advisory board, they have to find that it's consistent with those guidelines, but anything you wanna add to that? No, that's right. I, it's it's, 1 of the mitigation measures, which again is a little confusing because then it's also just put in the zoning code. When the zoning was adopted, they just threw everything into the code as a as a development standard. So, yes, those are adopted and, guidance for the HAB. Okay. So when so when you develop the checklist or the so those will reflect the requirements, the National Historic Preservation requirement? Absolutely. The Secretary of Interior Standards are referenced in, 13 dash 21 in the historic preservation ordinance. So separate from the zoning but it's it's in the code and we would definitely wanna include that as part of the the universe of materials that future applicants, board members and staff would would need to be, referencing when bringing projects forward. Okay. So the way how I'm envisioning this, and you can correct me if I'm wrong, there'll be these general guidelines pertains to the Alameda Point, and then there'll be these sub area guidelines that will pertain to each, specific plan or precise plan area. Yeah. Is that what you're thinking? Yeah. You can imagine sort of a checklist. The specific plan areas overlap the historic district but they actually cover a lot of area outside the historic district guidelines. So, like, the waterfront town center covers the area, you know, like, east of Pan Am, basically, and along the Seaplane Lagoon, but mostly it covers everything from site A, like, that was previously developed along West Atlantic, those townhomes and apartment buildings there which are not in the historic district. So it's kind of, you know, it's like, okay, where am I? And then you got to sort of figure out which boxes apply to you. So you're gonna have a nice map that will show all these district boundaries. Okay. Thanks. Great. Any other, comments or questions? Board Member Wang? Yeah. Thanks for the thanks for the presentation. So so I'm understanding that the guide to the guides that you're currently working on is really just a crosswalk between the mitigation measure and the requirements that you already have codified in the zoning code. Right? Yeah. I think you could you could think of it as sort of like a a really big handout for that we would have in the permit center for people who want to build an ADU. Here's your 5 page handout on things you need to be thinking about for development and within the historic district we would we would have something obviously much more robust sort of, to present all of this different information and and help them pull the key pieces that you're likely to need but also sort of as a roadmap for where they need to go for further, investigation. Right. So at this point it seems more like a practical tool than really generating a new document of substance. I'm I'm curious whether you're gonna require an action from the planning board when you when you finalize this document. I think that's a good question. I defer to Steve. I don't think it necessarily depending on what form it takes, we'll definitely want to come to this, to the planning board and the historical advisory board, to provide input on it but since it's really just a sort of a tool and it's it's, you know, sort of supplementing the adopted guidelines, it doesn't necessarily, you know, we don't really feel the need like we would absolutely have to readopt it since it's really just referring to existing adopted plans. So it would feel a little redundant potentially. But we definitely wanna make sure everyone is comfortable with what that finished product looks like because it is really complicated set of, guidelines and and documents to sort through. Thanks. Thank you. And measure, requirements. So I thank you for doing that, research, and looks like it'll come back to us once it's ready to be all packaged up. So, thank you for the work and the update. Great. With that we will move on to item 5 B, which is, to look at the little opera house, project. This is a workshop. So, is there a staff presentation for this? Hello again. Lehi a lot of me tonight. No time no see. Hi again....
